PS commends Treasury teams for timely mid-term report submission

MICHAEL OMONDI-KNA

The Principal Secretary (PS) for Public Investments and Asset Management, Cyrell Odede Wagunda, has reaffirmed the National Treasury’s commitment to sustaining and enhancing high performance standards under the current Performance Contract cycle.

During a high-level consultative meeting on the 2nd Performance Contract Cycle Mid-Year Review for the Financial Year 2025/2026 for the National Treasury and Economic Planning, held at the Kenyatta International Convention Centre (KICC) in Nairobi, the PS commended departments and units within the National Treasury for the timely preparation and submission of the FY 2025/26 Ministerial Performance Contract mid-term report.

Additionally, Wagunda emphasized the importance of maintaining strong evidentiary documentation to support reported achievements, underscoring this as a critical element in performance evaluation.

In remarks delivered on his behalf by the Director General for Public Private Partnerships Kenya, Eng. Kefa Seda, the PS also acknowledged the vital role of technical staff in driving results and called on supervisors to provide the necessary support to ensure the successful realization of set targets.

He highlighted the collective responsibility shared across the three State Departments under the National Treasury, stressing the need for close collaboration and coordinated efforts in delivering on ministerial objectives.

“Performance and Delivery Management is a structured approach to planning, monitoring, evaluating, and reporting on institutional results to ensure achievement of Performance Contract (PC) targets,” explained Wagunda, adding that it provides a framework through which Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs) translate national priorities into measurable outputs and outcomes, while strengthening accountability, transparency, and service delivery.

He observed that at the core of effective performance management is clear target setting and alignment, noting that Annual Performance Contracts cascade national development priorities, Cabinet decisions, and ministerial mandates into specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) targets.

“These targets must be clearly communicated to all implementing units and officers to ensure institutional alignment and shared ownership of results,” urged the PS.

Equally, Wagunda maintained that continuous monitoring and tracking of progress is essential to maintaining compliance, insisting that institutions are required to establish internal monitoring mechanisms, including periodic performance reviews, data validation processes, and milestone tracking systems.

He added that regular internal reviews—monthly or quarterly— enable early identification of performance gaps and allow timely corrective action before mid-year and annual evaluations.

On the other hand, the PS pointed out that evidence-based reporting is a critical requirement in PC evaluation stressing that all reported achievements must be supported by credible, verifiable, and well-documented evidence in line with PC guidelines.

“Proper record keeping, data integrity, and documentation of outputs, outcomes, and impact indicators are fundamental to sustaining high performance ratings. Institutions must ensure that evidence is organized, accessible, and aligned to each specific target,” he outlined.

In addition, the PS mentioned that leadership and supervisory support significantly influence performance outcomes.

He highlighted that senior management is responsible for providing strategic direction, mobilizing resources, removing bottlenecks, and fostering a performance-oriented culture.

“Supervisors must actively guide technical teams, ensure clarity of roles and responsibilities, and promote accountability at all levels,” urged the PS.

Wagunda also stated that risk management and mitigation planning further strengthen compliance, emphasizing that institutions should proactively identify operational, financial, and external risks that may hinder achievement of targets and develop mitigation strategies.

He directed that escalation mechanisms should be in place to address challenges requiring higher-level intervention.